By: George B. Brooks, Jr. Ph.D.
Owner, NxT Horizon Group
There is a problem with “sustainability.” It seems everyone has a different definition or is unsure of the meaning of it, so there are widely different expectations of what the pathways and outcomes should be. Let me explain what I am talking about.
I recently had the pleasure of joining former Phoenix Mayor and former Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, Architect Taz Loomans (see previous blog), New York University Professor Andrew Ross and a number of other great people on a panel for the State of Sustainability in Metro Phoenix Arizona Forum at the George Washington Carver Museum and Cultural Center. Presented by the Downtown Voices Coalition, the focus of this standing room only event was to discuss the current state of sustainability in Phoenix using Ross’ book “Bird on Fire: Lessons from the World’s Least Sustainable City” as the catalyst.
To say the least it was a great evening and something very important happened there. In reading the media reviews of the forum and also interviewing some of the participants in preparing an article for my own magazine NxT Horizon, I saw a trend develop. There was an almost universal desire for what the writer J. Seth Anderson called “a holistic, grassroots approach to sustainability, which includes personal initiative and responsibility.” In my interviews everyone I talked to wanted a “takeaway skill.” Something they could take home to help them to leverage sustainability to bring value to their families, now without waiting for governments or leaders to say yes or provide the money. These comments closely echoed the words of Michael Pops who during the event’s question and answer session stated, paraphrasing here, that while we speak of solar panels and light rail, in South Phoenix where both he and I live, communities are being poisoned and elders can’t get a break on a water bill. In summary, people want “bottom up” sustainability.
The results of the evening confirm something I have been seeing for years and spoke of in an earlier Valley Forward blog “Grandma’s Green,” in NxT Horizon magazine and in other locations. If we wish sustainability to be sustainable, it needs to be useful and aligned to the needs of the people. The first challenge in doing this however, is as stated above, to get a workable definition.
To me, sustainability means what it always has, the ability to last. Better yet, when looking at it from the context of “Bird on Fire,” it means, “to survive and prosper for the short and long term.” Using these words though stark, gives the concept a very different context does it not? It gives real weight to Michael Pops’ comments and allows one to see why so many are concerned with the subject. It explains and clarifies the real “why” of our actions as we seek solutions. Imagine how many feathers Ross would have ruffled if he had used this definition in his title. Say, “Bird on Fire: Lessons from the World’s City Least Able to Survive and Prosper.”
When you look at sustainability from this perspective, all the definitions we have heard for the term now describe the processes we can use to achieve it. The one I like best comes from the Board of Trustees for Sustainability at Arizona State University, “Promoting human prosperity and well-being for all, while protecting and enhancing the earth’s life support systems.” So doing a small rewrite, sustainability (the ability to survive and prosper) can be achieved by promoting human prosperity and well-being for all, while protecting and enhancing the environment.
The cool thing about this concept is that it really is nothing new. Our grandparents and great grandparents used it back during the Great Depression. George Washington Carver used it when he helped sharecroppers in the South to recover by growing soil enhancing crops like peanuts, soybeans and sweet potatoes and then innovating hundreds of new products from them. They all harnessed and most importantly enhanced their local social, environmental and economic resources to create value for their families or people. This is the kind of “bottom up” takeaway the participants at the downtown forum were looking for. It is why when the question was asked, “How many of the nearly 400 people present have a garden,” nearly all hands went up. Now as we near the end of the Great Recession we have come full circle. Once again people are looking for “grass roots” ways to survive and prosper. All we need to do is teach them.



By: Taz Loomans
By: Craig Hughes
By: Janette Coates
By: Colin G. Tetreault